Analyse & assess how hobbes & locke's views differ on the state of Essay

Analyse & assess how hobbes & lockes views differ on the severalize of spirit, the social contract, and the system of government. To what extent was each philosophe - Essay ExampleThe State of Nature is a term in political philosophy used in social contract theories to describe the hypothetical condition of humanity before the states foundation and its monopoly on the legitimate use of physical force. (Wikipedia, 2006). In simpler words it is the condition before the rule of positive law comes into being or a way to discuss the conditions of society and government. Thinkers during the 17th and 18th century believed that whatever good things one had in the state of nature should not be muzzy when one entered into society. They evaluated the governments based on this condition.Locke believed that in the state of nature men mostly kept their promises. American frontier is an example of people in the state of nature, where property rights and (for the most part) peace existed (James, n.d.). He believed that the state of nature was good. People are in a state of nature when it is socially acceptable to vindicate for wrongdoings done against you. Hence, if the government could not do as much for people as they did for themselves in the state of nature, the government could be invalidated.Hobbes idea of the state of nature concern power and security and not the moral obligations. He believed that in state of nature people could behave badly towards each other. He compared the incline Revolution to the state of nature, which was brutal. He had a very negative view of the Revolution and this convinced him that kingship was essential.Hobbes opposed Lockes view that people go out generally follow the law of nature because they are naturally rational and not given to constant war. Locke believed that government should be from the people and that it should be moderate so as not to violate the natural rights of people. Locke states that the entire population has the r ight to punish an offender so that he will not buck the crime again and so that others will be deterred from moral law breaking. (Wikipedia, 2006).