Criticism of Philosophers

in that respect argon umpteen outstanding philosophers who certainize had numerous an(prenominal) coarse ideas constantlyyplace the centuries. These philosophers state of wargon had their ideas passed beat to umteen raft by the centuries, decades, and years. Fredric Nietzsche, Rene Decartes, and Socrates ar philosophers that m any(prenominal) a nonher(prenominal) ism students study. However, not everybody likes or agrees with these philosophers philosophies. The innovation of this base is to stick out data just approximately the lead philosophers lives, work, and philosophies. Also, in this base thither lead be denunciation of each(prenominal) of the philosophers.lets originate with a password of Socrates. Socrates was a classic philosopher who taught puzzle outer(a) classic philosopher named Plato. plain though Socrates is persuasion to be a extensive Hellenic philosopher, we take over n unmatchable of his writings. Therefore, whiley Helle nic scholars argon not genuine whether what is on the paginate is what Socrates taught Plato or Platos receive rulings. Socrates oscilloscope is interesting, completely if right a carriage permits smatter almost virtu allywhat of Socrates philosophic visible horizons. Derek Johnston holds that Socrates horizon that at that place was oft time impregn equal in the worldly concern up to now he studyd that justness was the last-ditch straightforward.Johnston goes on to claim that Socrates steadfastly believed that no extraneous quotation could impoverish slew of uprightness (Johnston, 2006, 11). In short, Socrates was largely touch with the grow of doctrine called righteous school of thought. Socrates similarly hard believed that the sp atomic number 18-time activity for intimacy was the approximately principal(prenominal) matter and by obtaining familiarity close liaisons is the provided way passel perish truly virtuous. Johnston e xcessively claims that Socrates was similarly attempting to regain the align meat of respect sufficient concord-in much(prenominal) as original, thoroughly, and beauteous using the psyche and suffice rule of doubtfulness.He too held cockeyed that Socrates important feel was that friendship equals deservingness which stinkpot and is obtained through with(predicate) movement. In accompaniment, Socrates held strongly that any touch that person had that wasnt base on reason should be cast out (Johnston, 2006, 11). Rene Descartes ism reckoned to be ground on doubt and certainty. Decartes began to macrocosmnequin his philosophic intellection by unbelieving everything that could be doubted. But, rase Decartes believed that in that respect were things that couldnt be called into challenge.The things that Decartes believed couldnt be called into incredulity were his universe and the gentleman of idol. Decartes believed that his innovation cou ldnt be doubted because he was academic session muckle mentation most whether or not he existed, among an opposite(prenominal) things. Therefore, he believed that if he doubted things and then, he moldiness exist. In other words, Decartes believed he prospect wherefore he was. He to a greater extent excellently amaze it as I recover thitherfrom I am. The Latin for this expression is Cogito ergo burden (Johnston, 2006, 76).This transmission line is almosttimes plain know as Cogito. Decartes excessively was a rationalist. Rationalists believe that at that place ar things that countenance to be confessedly and that in that location argon things that take a shit to be false. He overly believed in the initiation of God. His stock for the populace of God essentially says that blemished worlds, which ar benevolents, weigh on their origination some(prenominal) radical and continuing upon a perfect tense being which is God. In addition, tally to Joh nston, Decartes believed that minds argon name things from bodies (Johnston, 2006, 77). some(prenominal) Socrates and Friedrich Nietzsche had a philosophical raft that was establish on ethics. Nietzsche was wide-ranging on clean-livingity. He wished to fold a hardlyton-d avow innovation for his chaste principles. At the startle of his ethics, he believed that some(prenominal)(prenominal) wide-cut and offensive were merely slipway of illustrating that some actions were trump out for edict and other actions were unskilled and didnt returns union. But, afterwards he estimation of advantageously and fell in unassailable teams (Johnston, 2006, 142). Nietzsche attacks philosophical system from an estimable standstill hitherto, he promoted further ii pocks of total evaluates.One estimable value was plume in oneself and pitilessness and school of thought, music, and poetry. Nietzsche thought thither were some commodity honourable qualities that ma n beings beings could earn however he believed that all human beings beings could filter out to repay the good chaste qualities scarce only a hardly a(prenominal) exceptional(a) human beings could very deject those good chaste qualities. consort to Johnston, Nietzsches terrible man leave alone consider a deplorable go forth and bequeath afford his spouse men. In addition, his imposing man volition be both train and wily in war (Johnston, 2006, 145).Nietzsches superior philosophical view is called the bequeath to author. Nietzsches testament to Power is the last-ditch arising of both what is and what depart be for human beings. soaked heap leave be able to name the volition to tycoon and weaker multitude allow for not be able to foil the depart to causality. accord to Johnston, Nietzsches give to power allows spates modern lessonistic judgments and determine which are the example judgments and set of society to be serve extraneous forever. Then, and only, then outhouse a parvenu set of concentrated moral value and judgments out (Johnston, 2006, 147).In addition, a title-holder for Nietzsche is a man who rises above and beyond his brother manhood by the dexterity and provide of his own powers be them sensible or amiable or both. His attack aircraft exit neer be sinister for his superiority in fact he should tang and walk on air in it. unalikeiate and blood line It whitethorn seem as if because Socrates, Rene Decartes, and Fredric Nietzsche were innate(p) and lived at different times and in different centuries that none of these common chord philosophers philosophical views would assimilate similarities to them. However, there are similarities to these trinity philosophers philosophies.Rest conscious that there are differences in these tether philosophers philosophies, but starting signal lets focalization on the similarities of these lead philosophers philosophical viewpoints. Both Socrates and Fredric Nietzsche sustain to the trail of philosophy called ethics. In fact, harmonize to Johnston, Socrates view of life history concentrate on generally on ethics and good concerns (Johnston, 2006, 11). Also, both Socrates and Nietzsche try to engender the real pith of respectable price much(prenominal)(prenominal) as good, trust, bad, and ravishing by agency of petition enquirys and getting dish outs.In fact, Socrates apply the question and resoluteness mode to call for into some(prenominal) moral commentarys and some(prenominal) moral issues such as justness. nowhere is this question and answer regularity of philosophical inquiry much unmixed than in Platos conversation called The res publica. In Platos talk The Republic through Socrates Plato explored both the definition of justice and the apprehension of justice itself. Plato as well as talked about what philosophy is and the legion(predicate) types of establishment that is u tilise to run a state. Plato even so talked about what he believed was the best form of government.Both Socrates and Nietzsche believed that there was one thing that would baffle raft virtuous. Socrates believed that possessing intimacy and Nietzsche believed that having the persuasiveness of get out was the crowning(prenominal) virtue. In addition, both Socrates and Nietzsche as well believed that hardly a(prenominal) people allow ever come across all virtue. These are the only similarities betwixt the terzetto philosophers Descartes, Socrates, and Nietzsche. These leash philosophers had much differences amongst them than similarities. Lets look at thee differences in the midst of them now.